Loading current market data
Loading current market data
By Yield.ly Editorial · Reviewed by Thrive.fi Research · Published 2026-08-25 · Updated Aug 25, 2026, 7:17 AM UTC
Live data snapshot as of Aug 25, 2026, 7:17 AM UTC. Sources: DefiLlama and verified provider feeds. See methodology and data sources.
Base APY is yield from the core market mechanism: lending interest, trading fees, validator rewards, or strategy revenue. Reward APY is the extra layer from token emissions, liquidity mining, or temporary campaigns. Total APY is usually both added together, but only the base portion tends to survive when incentives end.
Base APY is what the market pays before anyone adds a promotional token on top. In lending, it is borrower interest routed to suppliers. In liquidity pools, it is trading fees shared with LPs. In staking, it is validator rewards and network fees. In vaults and structured products, it is strategy revenue after costs.
Base yield can still move. Borrowing demand drops, volume fades, or validator economics shift. It is not permanent. It is just tied to activity rather than a emissions schedule.
Reward APY is the incentive layer. Protocols mint or allocate governance tokens, points, or partner tokens to attract deposits. That can inflate the headline number fast.
When a dashboard shows reward APY as "not reported," the total may still include incentives the provider has not decomposed. That is a data gap, not proof that rewards are zero. See our reward APY glossary entry and why DeFi rates change for context.
In most dashboards, including Yield.ly when sources allow:
Total APY ≈ Base APY + Reward APY
Providers disagree on timing. Base might reflect trailing fees while rewards use forward emissions. Compounding assumptions differ. Some sources annualize daily snapshots; others use 7-day averages. Always read the timestamp beside the number.
On Yield.ly, when both components exist, reward share above half the total is flagged visually in research views because incentive-heavy listings behave differently in volatile rate environments.
Base APY is not one mechanism. It is the organic layer of whatever product you are in. The table below is the reference frame Yield.ly uses when decomposing upstream feeds.
| Product type | Typical base APY source | What moves it |
|---|---|---|
| Lending (Aave, Morpho, Compound) | Borrower interest paid to suppliers | Utilization, borrow demand, rate curves |
| Liquidity pool (Uniswap, Curve) | Trading fees to LPs | Volume, fee tier, competing liquidity |
| Staking / LST | Validator rewards and network fees | Participation, issuance, commissions |
| Vault / strategy | Net strategy revenue after costs | Underlying yield, harvest frequency, fees |
| Restaking | Base staking plus allocated work fees | Operator demand, slashing risk, queue time |
Reward APY sits on top of these rows when a protocol adds emissions. That is why two markets with similar base mechanics can show wildly different headline totals.
Yield.ly ingests normalized pool data from DefiLlama and other verified providers. When a source reports both components, Yield.ly preserves the split rather than collapsing it into a single headline. When only total APY is available, base and reward may show as unavailable rather than guessed.
DefiLlama's yield pages often separate underlying yield from incentive tokens. That decomposition is the industry baseline Yield.ly aligns with. See our data sources page for attribution and refresh cadence.
Use this when comparing two opportunities with similar total APY:
Pair this framework with APY versus TVL analysis and high-APY scrutiny.
Thrive.fi's crypto glossary defines related terms for readers who want parallel trading and DeFi vocabulary.
Base APY disagreements usually come from timing, not malice. One provider annualizes yesterday's fees. Another uses a 7-day trailing window. Reward tokens may be priced at different timestamps. Yield.ly stores the observation time beside each value so you can compare snapshots fairly.
When sources disagree materially, Yield.ly prefers verified provider feeds and surfaces freshness state rather than blending incompatible numbers into one synthetic rate.
| Metric | Current value |
|---|---|
| Opportunity | EVAUSDT-EVAUSDC (shadow-exchange-legacy) |
| Total APY | 9.42% |
| Base APY | 0.00% |
| Reward APY | 9.42% |
| Reward share | 100% |
| TVL | $1M |
| Metric | Current value |
|---|---|
| Median base APY (qualified opportunities) | 2.58% |
| Share with reward incentives | 20.5% |
| Qualified opportunities in snapshot | 4393 |
| Snapshot timestamp | Aug 25, 2026, 7:17 AM UTC |
| Opportunity | Total APY | Base APY | Reward APY | TVL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWAVES (pepeteam-swaves) pepeteam-swaves · Waves | 350.51% | 350.51% | Unavailable | $230.3K |
| SUSDAT (pendle) pendle · BSC | 331.41% | 331.41% | Unavailable | $2.4M |
| SUSDAT (pendle) pendle · BSC | 318.55% | 318.55% | Unavailable | $2.4M |
| SUSDAT (pendle) pendle · Ethereum | 233.29% | 233.29% | Unavailable | $2.5M |
| SUSDAT (pendle) pendle · Ethereum | 225.24% | 224.71% | 0.53% | $2.5M |
| Opportunity | Total APY | Base APY | Reward APY | Reward share | TVL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVAUSDT-EVAUSDC (shadow-exchange-legacy) shadow-exchange-legacy · Sonic | 9.42% | 0.00% | 9.42% | 100% | $1M |
| WCFX-XCFX (nucleon) nucleon · Conflux | 0.15% | Unavailable | 0.15% | 100% | $236.9K |
| 1INCH (1inch-swap) 1inch-swap · Ethereum | 0.00% | Unavailable | 0.00% | 100% | $2.3M |
| USDT-USDC (blackhole-clmm) blackhole-clmm · Avalanche | 28.79% | 0.00% | 28.79% | 100% | $280.3K |
| HYAUSD (curvance) curvance · Monad | 3.29% | 0.00% | 3.29% | 100% | $399.4K |
These patterns show up constantly in DeFi research. Thrive.fi's DeFi trading research covers similar incentive dynamics for active traders evaluating on-chain liquidity.
No. Base yield follows real activity. A lending market with falling borrower demand reprices quickly. A pool with declining volume pays less in fees. Validator yields move with network issuance and participation. Base is usually more durable than emissions, not immortal.
Yield.ly surfaces total, base, and reward APY separately when upstream data allows. Ranking weighs risk-adjusted usefulness, not raw headline APY. Missing reward decomposition lowers confidence and may trigger qualification warnings. See qualification methodology and base APY in the glossary.
Yield.ly is built by Thrive.fi, which publishes DeFi market research and maintains a crypto glossary for traders and researchers.
Base APY comes from core market activity like lending interest or fees. Reward APY comes from token incentives on top. Total APY is usually the sum when both are reported.
Base yield is usually more durable because it is tied to activity, not emissions. It is not a safety guarantee. Smart-contract, oracle, and market risks still apply.
Protocols use token incentives to bootstrap liquidity. Emissions can be generous early, which pushes reward APY above organic base yield.
Reward APY often collapses toward zero. Total APY may fall to base yield only, or lower if deposits leave with the incentives.
On Yield.ly, yes when the source reports both components. Some external dashboards show a single headline number without decomposition.
Yes. Campaigns end, emissions slow, or token prices drop. Reward APY can change faster than base APY.
The upstream provider has not split incentives from base yield. Yield.ly shows the gap rather than guessing.
Use total APY to compare headline return, but use base APY to judge durability. If total is high because reward APY dominates, plan for reward risk.
Check base versus reward share, TVL, rate history, and observed risk together. Start with this guide, then read how much APY is too high and why rates change.
Often yes when upstream data allows. Yield.ly normalizes that split in the dashboard when providers report it.
The breakdown of total APY into base (organic) and reward (incentive) components. Composition matters more than the headline alone.
This guide is for research and education. Yield rates change, smart-contract risk is real, and nothing here is investment advice. Rates shown on Yield.ly are observed snapshots, not guarantees.
Guides are written by Yield.ly editorial staff and reviewed against live dashboard data and public methodology docs. Sponsored placements never change qualification or ranking logic. See commercial independence.